OJ Simpson robbing casinos, wtf?!

Woke up this morning at the crack of 10 a.m., turned on the TV and there it was: "OJ Simpson questioned by Las Vegas police as possible suspect in casino burglary."

Huh?

If you notice, OJ Simpson has been in the news a lot lately, what with the release of his book If I Did It, which I believe has since been retitled (by the motherfucking Goldman family) to I Did It, not to mention the fact that the racial dynamic in the '08 presidential election seems to recall the reading of the verdict in his criminal trial about 12 years ago in the minds of many.

It's too bad he can't make any legit money without having to hand it over to the parents of that douche who was banging his wife (which must be a tough blow to take, as a guy). Which brings me to my point.

White people need to stop fucking with OJ.

Now, I have no idea whether or not he's guilty of stealing baseball cards from someone's hotel room, and I'm willing to withold judgment until he can find whoever's today's equivalent of Johnnie Cochran to get this shit over and done with, but even if he did, it's probably because how else is he going to get paid?

I'd be lying if I said I understood all of the legal issues at play here (remember, I was pre-med), but it never sat quite well with me that the Goldman family could take his ass to the cleaners in a civil trial like that. This despite the fact that a jury of his peers had already declared that he wasn't the one who did it.

Obvious issues with this bullshit:

a) Why should a man have to pay some money for some shit he didn't even do? It reminds me of the time I got pulled over on the way to high school and 5-0 tried to bring me in on some tickets on my car before I even owned it.

b) They knew good and well OJ didn't have $30 million. They should've just sued him for whatever was in his savings account and been done with it. But this suing people for every dollar they ever make in life reeks to me of indentured servitude, which I believe was outlawed by the 15th amendment or which ever one it was.

Indeed it's too bad Johnnie Cochran has been dead for a few years now. You get the idea that he could've argued that original $30 million judgment down to 10% in cash, plus a promise that this will never happen again, as if that shit was an overdue cable bill. Then there wouldn't have to have been any casino burglary.

Comments

[danthrax]

Please Bol, don't lump "Vindictive Jews" in the whitey crowd.

[Bol]

^Just when I thought I was able to parse all of the BS racial distinctions in an issue.

[jamie]

Man, OJ has gotten fat as hell..

[ill will]

i thought you majored in business

[RedZepprin]

1. As to the basic, ontological right and wrong of this, I agree; Fred Goldman always struck me as a manipulative asshole or a naif. Does he not understand that his son was banging O.J. Simpson's wife?

2. As to the legal issues, Bol (and I understand that you were pre-med, so don't worry about it). First of all, civil and criminal liability have nought to do with one another. There is no "double jeopardy" which crosses that divide.

Furthermore, civil courts have a far, far, lower quantum of proof than do criminal. I'm sure you're aware of this (even as a pre-med guy), but in a criminal court, it's said to be "beyond a reasonable doubt" (99.9% certain) In a civil, it's said to be "a preponderance of the evidence" (51% certain).

In addition, a civil jury has no unanimity requirement for a verdict. Civil juries split on verdicts all the time.

[Bol]

My degree is in "business," which is kinda like not having a college degree anyway. Hence the joke that I don't understand the law because I was too busy studying medicine, when the truth of the matter is that I don't know shit about shit.

[rashadlogic]

How in the fuck could O.J. rob a casino?

The only way I can see that even be slightly possible is unless he on some Ocean's Eleven shit. The only motive I see him doing this is the fact dude ain't got the money like he use to...

Still.. who in they right mind would rob a casino and believe not getting caught... especially a casino in LAS VEGAS... the security there is tighter than a pair of Abercrombie jeans on an overweight white girl.

[rashadlogic]

"LAS VEGAS - Investigators questioned O.J. Simpson and named him a suspect Friday in a confrontation at a casino hotel room involving sports memorabilia. The former football star said he went to the room to retrieve property he said was stolen from him but denied breaking in"

Hmmm... NVM. I thought it was money. He was trying to retrieve stuff that was already was his according his statement. Dude even escorted him up into the room where they was holding his stuff.

You think he was set up?

[Bol]

>You think he was set up?

Probably. If anyone should be questioned in this, it's Ron Goldman.

[The Spaniard]

Let me start by saying...O.J. was/is innocent, and I'm not just saying that on some fuck the white man shit either.

That trial was laughable. (especially when he skated up out of that bitch!) Anyone who watched that trial and looked at everything presented with a reasonable and logical mind would have to come to the conclusion that something (everything?) was foul on the police end.

I didn't (and still don't) give two shits about O.J. on a significant level before this but I laugh my ass off when he is driving around, still banging white bitches, spending his NFL pension and retirement fund, which was protected wisely by his crack team of TI's.

"Excuse me bitch, it's a switch, you can't fade me!"
Ice Cube from "You Can't Fade Me - Death Certificate"

[barbarian at the gate]

Well, OJ isn't exactly the kind of cat who inspires a strong sense of honesty or someone to have faith in.

Sounds like its time for another replay of the best lawyers money can buy and making sure of having an all-black jury when determing actual guilt and conviction.

[RedZepprin]

Bol -- I know your degree was in business. I was just giving you your own "pre med" shtick back.

[matt]

OJ is not even kind of broke. He lives in Florida because state law protects his pension from civil suit awards. So he is getting his NFL pension of $250,000 per year and the Goldman family can't touch it. And he was guilty as shit. The police fucked up and half of the evidence against him was excluded from trial. The victims' blood was even found in the bottom of OJ's shower drain but the police warrant didn't cover it, so it was excluded. In the civil trial they were able to introduce alot of the evidence that could not be introduced in the criminal trial.

[Mark Fuhrman]

Lmao....So what they found blood in his drain? You got KKK Fuhrman as the lead detective bragging about all the blacks he set up to go to jail. We really don't know who did it? Probably O.J. but thanks to Fuhrman I have real fucking doubts. I tell you the best and most hilarious movie ever was the OJ Simpson trial movie with Johnny Cochran being played by Ving Rhames. I recommend that movie to everybody for a good laugh. Speaking of celebrity murder and Ving Rhames, is that dude gonna be charged with murder for his dogs getting Michael Vick revenge on his illegal alien gardner?

[d.j. bradley]

Pre-med, pre-law, what's the difference?

The initial headlines to this matter were, "O.J. decides to pull his own sting." I think everybody has done that on a very small level, like putting out a ten dollar bill to see if your "bud" will steal it during the night. But O.J. should know that people like the press and all the T.V. pundits would pick up on that action.

I am grateful to O.J. providing the greatest non stop entertainment in the history of show business, his own criminal murder trial.

For one solid year, from the famous Bronco chase, to the announcement of the verdict it was all O.J. all the time. There was never a boring day.

In Los Angeles and most parts of San Diego, you could wake up in the morning and turn on KTLA and follow all O.J. all the time.

It was better than any McGarret: it was entertainment bliss.

The media careers launched by O.J. were everybody and his mother you see plastered all over today's television. Geraldo, Bill 'O Reilly, you name 'em they were all there. If they would donate 10 percent of their current salaries to O.J. they would be getting off light.

I figure the media owes O.J. billions of dollars for entertaining the nation daily for a solid year.

The stupid prosecutors of the O.J. trial thought they would get fancy with the case and try it in downtown L.A. rather than in tony Brentwood. This meant they got a black jury pool that didn't like cops and were sympathetic to Cochran's arguments.

When time came to throw down the verdict they couldn't get out of there fast enough. It was a verdict with an excitement worthy of the rest of the trial.

Thanks O.J., keep up the great entertainment.

[The Spaniard]

1. The jury wasn't all black.

2. During his testtimony the lead detective said he took the blood drawn from OJ to his own home "by mistake" and checked it in the next day.

3. When it turned out the amount of blood checked in wasn't the same as the amount recorded when drawn you know what the answer to that was? "Oops, my bad! I must have drawn less than I said."

4. Blood that was found on OJ's sock was soaked though on both sides in a symetrical pattern. When the leading forensic scientist in the WORLD says, under oath with no loyalties or biases, that would not have happened from a blood splatter, but in fact it is consistent with someone placing the blood there I have to say...Fly pelican, Fly!

5. There is a whole host of other shit that I could list (I watched a vast majority of the trial first hand.)

6. OJ = Wife beater? Sure. OJ = murderer? Probably not.

Get the fuck out of here.

[incogg negro™]

What if all of this finally leads to O.J. getting the death penalty and he rises from dead because it turns out He is the second coming of Jesus Christ?

What if OJ dies for YOUR sins?

Think about it you Jews.

[the izza]

Jena Six, My neck, my back

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=14414552

The B-Shop on NPR: Smarten up.

[melogrl248]

Ok, maybe O.J. is innocent. But why in the hell would he attach his name to a book titled "If I Did It". That shit is mighty suspicious and sick as hell. All you O.J. supporters can say that he wrote or had whoever to write the book for the money, but is he really that hard up for cash? Could'nt he have tried to clear his name and wrote his autobiography instead. That would've also been a best seller.
And why when the police wanted to question him about the murders, he led them on a long ass chase. If my spose was just murdered and I was innocent of the crime, I would cooperate and try my best to help find the person who did do it.

[melogrl248]

^ In O.J.'s case he was divorced, but if I was him I would have helped the police in anyway possible if my baby mamma had been brutally murdered, instead of trying to duck and dodge the police.

[The Spaniard]

The mistake people are making with Simpson is that he is expected to be a great orator or some sort of master tactitian/public relations mastermind.

No doubt that the "Find the real killers" line was dumb but that doesn't indicate any guilt or innocence. What the fuck was he going to do? Get a magnifying glass and a basset hound?

As for his long chase, once again that has to taken into perspective. Why would he automatically feel compelled to have faith in the US justice system after being named the primary suspect in a double murder he didn't commit?

That reminds me of something that happened here in Chicago recently. The police shot a boy in the back and claimed he had a gun. Did he have a gun? Who knows? But that isn't really the point I am trying to highlight. Someone said "Well, why was he running from the cops if he was innocent? He had to be guilty of something." As if every person and/or community has a history of pleasant interactions with law enforcement. Would I have run from the cops? Probably not but I know some people who have been abused by the police who would have every (legal) reason in the world to quickly increase the distance between them and "Officer Friendly".

The newspapers in Chicago have countless accounts of "Officers of the Law" as drug dealers, stickup men, sexual predators, perpetrators of assault and battery of regular citizens, and bribery. So the mere fact that someone eluded contact with police, especially without a court issued warrant, is indictive of less than it would seem.

"...if I was him I would have helped the police in anyway possible if my baby mamma had been brutally murdered"

depends on the relationship. There are plenty of people I wouldn't give a rats ass about if they were murdered...and I supposed that theoretically includes a "baby mamma".

[A.C. "Al" Cowlings]

"As if every person and/or community has a history of pleasant interactions with law enforcement. Would I have run from the cops? Probably not but I know some people who have been abused by the police who would have every (legal) reason in the world to quickly increase the distance between them and "Officer Friendly".

So are you saying that the Juice, at the time, fell into the category of a person with a reason to quickly increase the distance between himself and pd? I don't think so. Actually, wasn't OJ "white" himself until he cut those two whites heads off?

Somebody help me, but I don't remember OJ being a pillar of the black community until he NEEDED the black community. 1) White womEn - check 2) White friends - check 3) White privilege - check (He did open those chicken restaurants in Watts and shit though, right. I guess that's community service of some kind)

We can clearly see where OJ gave up his happily attained "whiteness." The surprising thing is the amount of goofy fucks who decided to take him back after he turned his back on you. Let me leave you with a little quote: "You been had, you been took, you been hoodwinked, bamboozled, led astray..." (No Rosie Greer)

[incogg negro™]

I don't think OJ murdered Nicole and Ron.

I DO think he robbed a casino.

[alec]

Listen, we're all coming to the same conclusion but are skirting around the facts. It's apparent that the justice system was created for the white man to maintain his hegemony over the other races and the civil court system was for the Jew to engage in his natural instincts (greed and swindling).

[clarknova]

OJ's behavior AFTER the trial in the last decade is what convinced me he did it. Remember the fucking infomercial or special or whatever that was? And now, "(if) I did it?" Like another poster said, he doesn't need that money. So why on EARTH would he have that book made? Feel guilty much buddy? That motherfucker is crazy. Which, to me, indicates that he has BEEN crazy, and therefore could be guilty.
Bottom line though, the question of his innocence or guilt is something that will always be split along racial lines. OJ's trial proved one thing to me- in the U.S., if you have enough money, you can beat any rap. Regardless of your race. Yay capitalism!

[clarknova]

PS, I call bullshit on any semi-demi-intellectual wannabe using the word "hegemony." Especially when they trot out the old "Evil Jew" a sentence later.

[The Spaniard]

"So are you saying that the Juice, at the time, fell into the category of a person with a reason to quickly increase the distance between himself and pd?"

Yes...and here is where I said it...

"As for his long chase, once again that has to taken into perspective. Why would he automatically feel compelled to have faith in the US justice system after being named the primary suspect in a double murder he didn't commit?"

And here is where I address the effectiveness of that tactic, (the very first sentence none the less!)...

"The mistake people are making with Simpson is that he is expected to be a great orator or some sort of master tactitian/public relations mastermind"

"Somebody help me, but I don't remember OJ being a pillar of the black community"

I don't know if OJ was a pillar to the black community or not (probably not), nor is that relevant to my previous point. You assume I meant "Black" people have reason to fear the police..when I meant nothing of the sort.

What does being a pillar of the black community mean anyway? I think I can reasonably infer from your statements that, in part, it means dating black women exclusively, having no close personal friends that are white and denouncing any "white privilege" status placed upon you.

For the record, I think you are mistaking "rich privilege" with "white privilege".

[melogrl248]

Ok, maybe O.J. had a real reason to run from the cops, but that still doesn't accuse his behavior as of late. Why would an innocent man attach his name to a book titled "If I Did It"? A book in which he puts forth a hypothetical description of the murders for which he was acquitted of. What could possibly be his motive for writing that shit? The money, I think not. It seems to me like someone has a guilty conscience. An innocent or even a sane person would try to distant himself from such a crime.
And I feel so sorry for his kids. Why would a father want to profit off the murder of his children's mother? That's some cold ass shit.

[The Spaniard]

"What could possibly be his motive for writing that shit? The money, I think not."

I invite you to pay close attention to what people do for a few dollars every day. Rob, maim, kill, lie, etc. Even though I know better I give people more credit than I should all the time.

I understand why someone would be put off by the "If I Did It" book...but the profits were set up to go into a trust fund for his children as I recall.

The real issue to me is the value placed upon securing a financial future, whatever the cost. Would I write a book called "If I Did It"? Depends on the price...$50,000? Probably not. $50,000,000? Just a second...let me open Microsoft Word. And I agree, that is absolutely some cold ass shit.

My opinion of his guilt (or non guilt in this case) is based primarily on the evidence presented at the trial.

Oh yeah, I have always been curious as to how he cut his hand during the murders with gloves on anyway? Did he take them off between slashings? Or did he cut his hand first then try to stop the bleeding with the gloves? Very odd.

[patrick]

ron jr. was bangin oj's EX wife. stop saying "wife." ex, ex, ex. got it? and oj did the crimes, 100% guilty and he will burn in hell for it. dumb inner city hood rat jury. people like that shouldn't be able to vote, let alone decide a murder case. these people are not educated. i despise the uneducated.

[deeekin]

are there really people here arguing that oj is innocent? johnny cochran got you mother fuckers brainwashed.

[rashadlogic]

>dumb inner city hood rat jury. people like that shouldn't be able to vote, let alone decide a murder case. these people are not educated. i despise the uneducated.

WTH are you even talking about?

[The Spaniard]

"johnny cochran got you mother fuckers brainwashed."

Lead detectives taking blood evidence home(!) then checking in an amount less than initially recorded is what has me brainwashed. This alone should have been enough to find non guilt and that's without the laundry list of other nonsense in this case.

I'm still waiting of the rational explanation behind his cut finger with gloves on.

Oh yeah, the racial (racist) aspect...I forgot about that.

[joey]

fuck that OJ didnt kill anyone he might have raped a few bitches but honestly fuck them.... they liked it.

[melogrl248]

Some of the evidence was probably tampered with, but that doesn't mean O.J. is innocent. And it doesn't mean that he did commit the murders. All this means is that O.J., if he did do it, covered his ass pretty well, and the police fucked up. The lead detective was just alittle too gun-ho about locking up a rich, Black man.
Everything about the trial was a joke anyways, especially when John Cochran said "if the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit", so my opinion of his guilt is based primarily on his behavior. I want to believe that he is innocent, but as the old saying goes "if it walks like a duck and quakes like a duck, it's a duck". And O.J. walks the walk of a guilty man.

[melogrl248]

^correction: gung ho

[The Spaniard]

"if the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit"

That was a little much for me as well...although as we could see, the glove didn't fit!

"guilt based primarily on his behavior"

My arguement is that his behavior is of someone who lacks tact and education, plus someone who values money over what would be considered standard mourning behavior.

"Some of the evidence was probably tampered with, but that doesn't mean O.J. is innocent."

I agree, but legal trials should be based on evidence and not someone's gut feeling or the preconvieved notions of what an innocent man should act like after the fact.

In any event, I still need someone to explain why there is no knife cut in that glove yet he supposedly went over there with gloves, presumably to hide his fingerprints. Did he start the murderfest without the gloves on for some reason, get cut, then say to himself..."Fuck! Let me put these gloves on now to cover my tracks!".

Also...

The ingredient used to preserve blood found in a recovered O.J. blood sample from murder scene.

Strange.

[The Spaniard]

Wait! That EDTA additive in the blood came from eating McDonald's! Well, that's settled, thank god!

[ManFrizzle]

Yo Bol, I expect some sort of retraction or some shit!! I hope you heard that audio.

And how can he be ordered to pay for something he didn't do? I don't know, but I do know that he got ordered to pay for something he definitely DID do. A jury of his peers didn't declare that he didn't do it. They declared that the state did not prove he did. And he definitely fucked up both of those people. Both of their blood was all over his shit man!!!! C'mon now. This guy's got a temper like Tony Montana.

[deez_MFN_nutz]

just glad to see that OJ is finally in jail and likely to stay there the rest of his life. It's like when they got Capone on tax evasion. Except in this case, OJ's Vegas actions are so hilariously stupid, you have to wonder if either:

1. He got away with such an obvious murder back in the day that now he thinks he can get away with anything, including strong arm robbery

or 2. He can't take the guilt of being a murderer anymore so he's just doing whatever stupid thing occurs to him in a reckless, "please send me to jail to atone" kind of subconscious guilt release

[The Spaniard]

I see the Hollywood Upstairs Medical College has opened up an undergraduate Psychiatry program. Kudos for them.

[barbarian at the gate]

Oh Christ, not another OJ saga.

Lucky us, in for another soap-opera trial and media circus.

OJ is truly the epitome of the phrase: 'tempting fate'.

Well cat, you chose to handle your affairs 'street-nigga' style and now we'll all have to view another trial/farce.

Man, as if the daily news wasn't wearysome enough to begin with.

[Bolemia]

OJ needs to stop fucking with white people.

[barbarian at the gate]

^^

Always a good rule of thumb,Bolemia.

[patrick]

if any of you are really interested in a technical analysis of all things related to "oj 94" then i reccomend vincent bugliosi's book "outrage." those of you who want to defend him are falling into the trap of over emphasizing some issues-facts that seem to support your position- that oj was framed- and you completely ignore the substantial evidence that points directly to him as the guilty party. read a book, don't fall into the trap of repeating a few sound bites that you heard in 1994.

[The Spaniard]

I looked at that book awhile ago. Did nothing to change my mind. Rambling nonsense...ignoring every fact I listed above. Bugliosi's book is written from the perspective of a career DA whose goal is to "win cases", and not necessarily exposing the truth of a case.

One example...

" He faulted them, for example, for not introducing the note that Simpson had written before trying to flee. Bugliosi said that the note "reeked" of guilt and that the jury should have been allowed to see it."

I repeat...

I see the Hollywood Upstairs Medical College has opened up an undergraduate Psychiatry program. Kudos for them.

[patrick]

i don't get the point about bugliosi's book? it covers the evidence in detail. whatever. if oj didn't do it then who did? what is your guess? it was absolutely some sort of inside job. this was no random burglary gone bad.oj did it. but i will assume for sake of argument that he did not personally commit the murders. did he pay someone else to do it?who else would have wanted her killed? anyway, if oj had paid someone else to do it, the hit would have been far more professional. that was anything but a professional hit. nicole simpson was stabbed over 100 times, right? wtf? who the hell would do that unless there was some personal sh-it involved? who?

[The Spaniard]

"i don't get the point about bugliosi's book?"

Here's my point again...

...ignoring every fact I listed above. Bugliosi's book is written from the perspective of a career DA whose goal is to 'win cases' and not necessarily exposing the truth of a case.

"it covers the evidence in detail."

Lead detectives taking blood evidence home(!) then checking in an amount less than initially recorded.

What did he say about that minor tidbit?

"if oj didn't do it then who did? what is your guess?"

Who knows? Space Invaders? The Mob? Christ the King? Some crazed fuck that likes stabbing folks?

The point of a trial is to determine the guilt of the defendant, not to find the 'real killers' Perry Mason style.

"who else would have wanted her killed?"

How should I know? Someone else she pissed off maybe?

"if oj had paid someone else to do it, the hit would have been far more professional."

I'm sure you knowledge of the inner workings of the contract murder underworld is vastly greater than mine.

"who the hell would do that unless there was some personal sh-it involved? who?"

I got it! The other nigger who she had some personal shit with.

"it covers the evidence in detail."

Lead detectives taking blood evidence home(!) then checking in an amount less than initially recorded is what has me brainwashed. This alone should have been enough to find non guilt and that's without the laundry list of other nonsense in this case.

[The Spaniard]

By the way, O.J. could very well be the killer, shit, I could be the killer using that line of reasoning as I'm sure I don't have an alibi for that night and back in the day I was known to let my inner Ike Turner loose (regrettably) if a bitch got too flamboyant at the lip...I just would not have found him guilty based on a review of the evidence and the sworn testimony with regards to the handling of said evience.

[patrick]

you are a funny guy but you be playin the jeanette harris game is ignoring the evidence. according to harris, and i am going to paraphrase: "they be sayin that there was a one in 8 billion chance that the blood was not that fine brotha orenthal's. but anyone know that there aint but 6 million mo'phuckas on the earth." that was ms. harris's summary of the dna evidence. the furhman as oj hater thing is a bit of a crock, to say the least. he was the cop who answered the call the day oj was beatin on nicole on new yearrs day, whatever year that was.and he gave orenthal a massive break. in fact, there is a documented history of the lapd giving oj breaks.oj was a star. it's los angeles. oj being black had nothing to do with any aspect of that case. oj was a de facto rich wasp. deal with it. he had long ago turned his back on the bitches and kings in the hood.

[patrick]

also-
i know very well who bugliosi is-was. he makes many good points. the defense was 100% unethical. i could sit here all day and describe the dirty tricks they pulled. how about just one" comparing furhman to hitler. is that fair? is that appropriate in a court of law? what was the intention? hey, that's easy! to manipulate and confuse a very uneducated jury. well done, cochran. now burn in hell.
about your comment about "the other nigga" that nicole was phuckin wit- you mean marcus allen? that's it! it was marcus allen all along.

[The Spaniard]

"to manipulate and confuse a very uneducated jury."

I feel you brother. My personal theory is that most people are stupid anyway.

Now with that said....

"it covers the evidence in detail."

Lead detectives taking blood evidence home(!) then checking in an amount less than initially recorded is what has me brainwashed. This alone should have been enough to find non guilt and that's without the laundry list of other nonsense in this case.

Also...
The ingredient used to preserve blood found in a recovered O.J. blood sample from murder scene.

So, It would seem that I'm not ignoring the evidence. In fact I vaugely remember addressing this fact...here it is!

"I just would not have found him guilty based on a review of the evidence and the sworn testimony with regards to the handling of said evience."

Do I believe M. Fuhrman(?) was involved? Damn skippy. Why didn't he railraod OJ before? Who knows? I can't explain the mind of someone who is obviously irrational (being a racist and all). Why isn't he out buring crosses and murdering minorities on a daily basis. I can't explain that either. Nor should I have to.

I want someone to explain to me why VanAdder(?) took OJ's blood home (HOME! god damn it!) instead of checking it into the crime lab.

And I want someone to explain why there was less blood than initially recorded when he finally did check it in?

And I want some to explain where OJ's blood came from when he had gloves(!) on?

And I want someone to explain how blood soaked through OJ's leg to make a symetrical mark on both sides of the sock.

And I want someone to explain why there were thing moved around in the house before and after filming the crime scene?

And I want someone to tell me which ninja school OJ attended that taught an arthirtic former football player to slash to death two grown humans with a knife? Not saying I couldn't be done but Great Zeus Almighty that takes some fucking skill and balls.

"oj was a de facto rich wasp"

Yeah, ok. You keep believing that. I don't give a shit how much money you have to a racist you are still a nigger, rich or poor.

"comparing furhman to hitler."

Is it fair to make far fetched psychological determinations of guilt basis on a note that admits no such thing?

And furhman is comparable to hitler...they both believe in the superiorty of the aryan race (whatever the fuck that is)

I wasn't refering to Marcus Allen by the way. I meant any random nigger (human) she had beef with. I gave you my list of possible suspects. A crazy list, I know. That's because I don't have a theory on who the "real killer" is.

See, here's where I address that...

"The point of a trial is to determine the guilt of the defendant, not to find the 'real killers' Perry Mason style."

"he had long ago turned his back on the bitches and kings in the hood."

So what? Good for him! I addressed that by the way...

I don't know if OJ was a pillar to the black community or not (probably not), nor is that relevant to my previous point. You assume I meant "Black" people have reason to fear the police..when I meant nothing of the sort.

What does being a pillar of the black community mean anyway? I think I can reasonably infer from your statements that, in part, it means dating black women exclusively, having no close personal friends that are white and denouncing any "white privilege" status placed upon you.

[The Spaniard]

Ms. Harris obviously has no formal training in probability or statistics (which I do, albeit, on an undergraduate level). In any event, that is irrelevant.

See, I'm not disputing whether or not it was OJ's blood. I'm sure it was...BUT! Read this again...

1. Lead detectives taking blood evidence home(!) then checking in an amount less than initially recorded.

2. The ingredient used to preserve blood found in a recovered O.J. blood sample from murder scene.

Strange.

3. Blood that was found on OJ's sock was soaked though on both sides in a symetrical pattern. When the leading forensic scientist in the WORLD says, under oath with no loyalties or biases, that would not have happened from a blood splatter, but in fact it is consistent with someone placing the blood there I have to say...Fly pelican, Fly!

When someone explains these things then I am off the not guilty wagon.

[incogg negro™]

The Spaniard is the real killer.
patrick = pwned.

And as your reward I shall answer your questions, my Castilian friend...

"I want someone to explain to me why VanAdder took OJ's blood home (HOME! god damn it!) instead of checking it into the crime lab. And I want someone to explain why there was less blood than initially recorded when he finally did check it in?"

That's a silly question. Det. Van Adder had every reason to confiscate blood and take it to his home or "home lab," if you will. As wikipedia will tell you, Van Adder is a "protogoblin," which entails having enhanced strength and durability, as well as being unaffected by gunshots - but it also has the unusual downside of leaving one disfigured and grotesque, what with having fangs, clawed hands and feet. Van Adder was working hard to unlock the biochemical anomoly that resulted in the accident caused by his previous employer industrialist Norman Osborn, whom you may know better as The Green Goblin.

"...I want some to explain where OJ's blood came from when he had gloves(!) on?

In Mark Fuhrman's upcoming book "If He Did It" the idea is explained in this way: prior to OJ killing Nicole and Ron he performs an ancient African voodoo ritual wherein the punisher splashes himself with his own blood whist screaming "LULU-LULLU-ULULU-LULU-LULU-LU!"

"I want someone to explain how blood soaked through OJ's leg to make a symetrical mark on both sides of the sock."

The gloves were not the only thing that didn't fit. OJ's shoes were also ill-fitting which is why he stuffed several pairs of balled up socks in his shoes. He wore shoes that were too big for him because according to mein Füher-man, black men are 4-eva trying to sustain the myth that their dicks are big.

"I want someone to explain why there were things moved around in the house before and after filming the crime scene?"

Two words: Feng Shui.

"I want someone to tell me which ninja school OJ attended that taught an arthritic former football player to slash to death two grown humans with a knife?"

Amongst the evidence wrongfully kept from the jury is surveillance footage of OJ running through the airport at extraordinary speeds, sometimes leaping over the luggage of old women who cheer "GO OJ! GO!" These tapes are owned by Hertz, whom few people realize are behind the Nazis and the JFK assassination.

I hope this helps

[The Spaniard]

Wow! How could I have been so blind? It all makes perfect sense now!

Norman Osbourne indeed!

[thomas]

OJ speaks on his book:

http://www.newyorker.com/online/2007/10/01/071001on_onlineonly_borowitz